Why does a photo show the wrong colour?
Before any of the naming matters, there is a problem underneath it. The photo did not record the colour of the garment. It recorded the light that happened to be falling on it, filtered through whatever the camera decided the white balance should be.
Warm indoor bulbs push everything towards orange. Overcast daylight pulls it towards blue. A shop's own lighting is usually built to make clothes look richer than they are. Then the phone applies its own correction, and then your screen applies its own again, at whatever brightness you happen to have it set to.
The practical effect is that a beige coat can read as pink, grey or light brown in three photos of the same coat. So the first rule of naming a colour from a photo is to name the colour family rather than the exact shade, and let the garment word do the narrowing.
Why does every shop use a different name for the same colour?
Colour words in clothing are marketing language. No standards body decides what taupe means, and nobody is checking. One shop's sand is another's oatmeal and a third's stone, and all three are describing a garment you would call light brown.
This cuts both ways. It means there is no single correct word to find, which is freeing. It also means the plain everyday word is usually the worst thing to search, because it is the one word the shop did not type.
Neutrals are where this bites hardest, because that is where the vocabulary is widest. These are the ones worth knowing, roughly from warmest to coolest.
- Cream. Off-white leaning yellow. Softer than white, warmer than ecru.
- Ecru. Off-white leaning grey or beige. The word comes up constantly in denim and knitwear.
- Bone. The coolest off-white, closest to plain white.
- Oatmeal. A pale flecked beige, usually a knit, usually with visible darker fibres in it.
- Taupe. Grey-brown. The most argued-over word on this list and worth trying whenever light brown fails.
- Camel. A warm mid brown with a yellow cast, strongly associated with coats.
- Stone and sand. Pale, grey-toned neutrals used mostly on trousers and outerwear.
- Khaki. Be careful. In the US this usually means a pale tan, and in the UK it usually means olive green. Two different colours, one word.
Black, white, grey and navy are the exception to all of this. Shops write them plainly and consistently, so the ordinary word is the right search and no narrower synonym is needed.
What two things does a pattern name have to cover?
Here is the part almost everyone leaves out, and it costs more results than any colour mistake.
When you name a pattern you are answering what the motif is. Hearts, flowers, stripes, leopard. You are not answering how that motif is arranged on the garment, and those are two different products.
A shirt covered in small repeating hearts and a shirt with one large heart across the chest are both correctly called a heart shirt. They hang in different parts of a shop and they suit different people. A search for a heart shirt returns both, mixed together, and you scroll past dozens of the wrong one.
Snagfit reports the arrangement as its own field on every piece it finds, with three possible values.
Allover
Small motifs repeating across the whole garment.
Shops also write: scattered, repeating, ditsy
Single large graphic
One big motif, usually across the chest or the back.
Shops also write: placement print, front graphic
Plain
No motif at all, which is worth saying out loud.
Shops also write: solid, unprinted
Adding one of those words does more for a patterned search than adding a second colour ever will. "Allover heart print shirt" and "single large heart graphic shirt" separate cleanly. "Heart shirt" never does.
What do you call a pattern that is woven in rather than printed?
Some patterns are not printed on the fabric. They are the way the fabric was made, built into the yarn and the weave, and no printed version of them exists.
Rib, cable, waffle, herringbone and pointelle all fall into this group. If you search for a printed herringbone shirt you will find little, and it is not because the garment is rare. It is because herringbone is a weave, so the listing describes the construction rather than a print.
The tell in a photo is depth. A print sits flat on the surface and the fabric behaves the same everywhere. A woven or knitted pattern casts tiny shadows of its own and changes how the light moves across the cloth. If you can see texture rather than just colour, search the construction word.
How can you check a colour when the lighting is off?
There is a way around the lighting problem, and it costs a few seconds. Find something in the same photo whose real colour you already know, then judge the garment against it rather than against your memory.
A plain white wall, a sheet of paper, the white of an eye, a white trainer sole, a fridge door. All of these are things you know are close to white in real life. If the wall behind the person is running warm and yellow in the photo, then the whole image is running warm, and the beige coat is probably a colder, greyer colour than it looks. If the wall has gone blue, the reverse is true.
This matters most on the neutrals, because that is exactly where a small shift changes the word. The gap between cream and bone is smaller than the gap between two photos of the same jumper taken in different rooms. Judging against a known reference in the frame is the difference between searching taupe and searching pink.
When there is nothing in the frame to judge against, go one step broader. Search the colour family rather than the shade, and let the garment type and the pattern carry the search. Broad and right beats narrow and wrong.
Which pattern word should you search with first?
When a photo has a pattern in it, one of five families almost always covers it. Getting the family right matters more than getting the exact name right, because the family is what a shop files the garment under.
- Lines running one way. Stripes. Now the only question is how wide they are and how far apart, which is what separates a pinstripe from an awning stripe.
- Lines crossing each other. The check family. Reach for the specific word rather than plaid, because plaid is only one member of it.
- Flowers. Florals, where the single most useful word is the size of the flower rather than its colour.
- Animal markings. Leopard, zebra, snake, cow. Name the animal, then say whether the colours are natural or not, because a blue leopard print is its own product.
- Shapes with no subject. Geometric and abstract, which is the hardest family to name and the one where describing the arrangement does the most work.
Once the family is settled, the arrangement question from the section above still applies to every one of them, and it is still the word most people leave out.
How many words should a search for a patterned garment have?
Every word you add to a shopping search is a filter. That is useful right up until it is not, because a listing that simply did not happen to use your fourth word disappears from the results even though it is the garment.
A workable shape for a patterned garment is three parts: the dominant colour, the pattern with its arrangement, and the garment type. "Cream allover ditsy floral midi dress" is five words doing five separate jobs, and every one of them is a word a shop plausibly typed.
What breaks it is naming every colour you can see. A print with cream, navy, rust and sage in it is not searched as all four. Name the ground colour, name the print, and let the pictures do the rest of the work.
What does Snagfit tell you about colour and pattern?
Snagfit reports a colour and an arrangement for every garment it finds, in plain words rather than trade names, alongside the search phrase it will use. Reading those two fields is the fastest way to see why a result came back the way it did.
When the colour it reports does not match what you see, that is usually the lighting problem from the top of this page rather than a mistake about the garment. The fix is to try a neighbouring colour word from the neutral list above, since the shape and the pattern are doing most of the work anyway.
It will not always get the arrangement right either. A large motif photographed close up can read as an allover print, because at that crop it genuinely looks like one. That is the case where knowing the three values yourself lets you correct it in one word.
Where do colour and pattern searches usually fail?
Each chapter takes one part of this and goes deep, and each one names the specific failure it prevents. Start wherever your photo is stuck.